May 5, 2017--Winners & Losers
What the Times found should be no surprise and suggests why GOP House members were in such a hurray to vote--if any of them took the time to read the legislation (few did) they might have been embarrassed to be made aware of what was in the bill and what they were heartlessly voting for.
It also might have given them pause before, like needy children, they rushed to Big Daddy at the White House to have him praise them for their dastardly deed. And, yes, to have a Bud Lite together before heading back to their home districts for yet another ten day-vacation. They had after all had to work for their $174,000 salary for two whole weeks since their last "recess."
Here are the winners and losers--
Winners:
High-income earners--eliminates taxes for couple earning at least $250,000 a year.
Upper-middle-calss people without pre-existing health conditions.
Young middle-class people without pre-existing health conditions.
People who opt to go without insurance--the bill eliminates the individual Obamacare mandate.
Large employers--eliminates employer Obamacare mandates.
People who want less comprehensive coverage.
Losers:
Poor people.
Older adults in most states.
People with pre-existing health conditions in many states.
State governments because of cuts in Medicaid--including, little noticed, for special education.
Hospitals--because up to 24 million people will lose coverage and thus hospitals will have fewer patients. Millions will again seek care in high-cost emergency rooms.
Planned Parenthood which will not be allowed to receive any government funds for at least one year.
Labels: Congressional Budget Office, Healthcare, House of Representatives, New York Times, Obamacare, Planned Parenthood, Republicans, Special Education
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home