Monday, March 09, 2015

March 9, 2015--Bending Time

Twice a year we have our own little experience with Einstein's Theory of Relativity. When in the fall we fall back, turning our clocks back an hour, and as we did yesterday by springing forward, losing an hour as we turned our clocks forward.

Some say this semiannual ritual is outdated. That it is a vestigial product of the agricultural era when men and their sons plowed and worked the fields from sun up to sun down and wanted to make the work day more productive by adding an hour of daylight as the growing season began in early March. And thus 100 years ago Daylight Savings Time was invented. But now that few work on farms, many more in offices, we should just leave our clocks alone, they say, and thereby reduce the confusion and crankiness that inevitably occurs whenever an hour is "lost" or "gained."

I put quotation marks around lost and gained because strictly speaking there is no time lost nor gained--all we do is change the clocks, which, in Einsteinian terms do not in reality keep track of what he would consider time. Time to him, and now to anyone who has even a rudimentary understanding of his work, is independent of our ability to measure it and even if we figured out how to do that in absolute terms, the reality of time would elude us since there is no such thing as time that is immutable. It is relative, shifting as circumstances affect it.

To complicate matters further, there is that supernova we've been hearing about lately that "seems" to explode over and over again, with seems this time in quotes. In quotes because supernovas do not explode repeatably. At the far reaches of the universe, when they explode they do so only once, often leaving residual black holes. But as scientists reported last week about the Supernova Refsdal, approximately every ten years the Hubble telescope picks up images of its billions-of-years-ago cataclysmic destruction.

Einstein taught us this is because gravity has the capacity to bend both light and time. So Refsdal was "seen" to be exploding first in about 1964 (actually this was the visual image of its explosion billions of years ago finally reached us) and then we "saw" it explode again and again in 1995 and 2014 and we will be "seeing" it again, Groundhog Day style, some time around 2020. Not multiple explosions but the same explosion over and over again because the image of it gets to us at different times as the result of gravity's awesome light- and time-bending power. With light becoming a lens through which we "see" cosmic events and experience time.

So rather than grumble about having to fool with our clocks semiannually, why not enjoy participating in Einstein's universe by spending a little time then thinking about the "new" physics, which is now about 100 years old and thus not so new.


I like springing forward and falling back for another reason.

With my mother nearly 107, we have been living the past seven years in her time zone. Traveling up and down the I-95 corridor between New York City, Midcoast Maine, and South Florida. This is in large part to be available to get to her as quickly as possible in case we are needed and also to enable us to live with the guilt that we do not spend all year down south with her. We can say that though we are not here all year at least we won't have to cross any time zones to get to her in an emergency.

This may very well be a rationalization to cover with socially-acceptable denial the probable fact that over time whatever adventurous spirit we have has waned. We tell ourselves that living this way is only for the time being (time being being another Einsteinian concept), that we are eager to resume traveling, to make our long-deferred trip to India, to spend a year living in Rome, to wander through the Greek Islands, but while waiting for the inevitable, the passage of time to contribute to reclaiming whatever wanderlust can be revived, this twice-a-year ritual of adjusting our clocks and watches stands for what travelers are required to do when they "really" cross time zones, with really in quotes.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, July 09, 2014

July 9, 2014--Weight of the World

We needed some crushed rock to fill empty patches in one of our garden paths. I went to the contractor's yard where we bought some last year. I brought an empty five-gallon bucket since it comes loose and has to be shoveled into something to be able to transport it.

It was a hot morning and I took my time filling the pail. When topped out I attempted to lift it and slide it into the back of our station wagon. Last year it was difficult, this year nearly impossible.

"This weighs a ton," I grunted to Rona who was getting out of the car to help me hoist it.

"Not exactly," she said, always the literalist.

"It feels like one, but if it's not a ton, then how much does it weigh?" I gasped.

"Maybe 50 pounds."

"Could be," I said now soaked with sweat.

"Maine is pretty much solid rock," Rona noted. "I wonder how much the whole state of Maine weighs."

"I'm not sure we can find that out but I do remember some years ago when Googling that I stumbled on how much the entire Earth weighs."

"How much?"

"I don't remember the specifics but we can look it up when we get home."

Which we did.

"It's an amazing amount," I said. "I don't know how to translate it into a number, like x-gazillion, but the actual number is 13,170,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pounds.

"How do they know? I mean determine that?"

"Good question. Let me see if I can find out."

"Making it particularly complicated," Rona added, "the Earth's not made of a single substance. I remember from high school Earth Science that there's the mantle, the molten core composed, I think, of iron and so forth."

I turned to Scientific America for guidance, believing it was my original source some years ago.

Sure enough, from March 2004, "How Can the Weight of Earth Be Determined?" which begins with a version of scientific metaphysics--like, what is weight anyway?

If you weigh yourself on a bathroom scale, the article noted, and you're 190 pounds, on the Moon, because of its smaller mass, you weigh only one-sixth of that. And then in deep space you'd weigh nothing at all. And for that matter, neither would Earth.

So where does that leave you? Actually nowhere useful because the issue is not how much the Earth (or you) weigh beyond our solar system but right here on, well, Earth.

So how do we figure out how much Earth weighs on Earth?

As you might imagine there are fancy, mathematical ways to do this (which I used to but no longer understand), or one can use that bathroom scale in an unorthodox manner.

Open the bathroom window, preferable one on at least the second floor, and throw the scale out of it. Count how long it takes to hit the sidewalk. Then measure the distance from the window to the street and with these figures you can compute the acceleration (g) of the scale. The answer you will get is 9.8. meters per second (s-2)  Knowing this value of g for Earth's surface, along with the gravitational constant G and the 6,731-kilometer distance to Earth's center, you have enough information to calculate Earth's mass--it will be 6 x 1024 kilograms.  Or, 13,170,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pounds.

When I explained all this to Rona (I mean, attempted to), she rolled her eyes up in her head and said, "Can we just go to the quarry now and get the crushed rock we need? I mean . . ."

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,