May 30, 2019--The Democratic Horse Race
Wanting to maintain some distance from the horse race that will determine who will be nominated to run against Trump in 2020, to keep from obsessing, I have been allowing myself to check the poll numbers, almost a year and a half before the election, just once a month.
Actually I take a peek more often than that. I confess to every two weeks. All right, sometimes weekly.
Real Clear Politics (RCP) is where I turn as they list and aggregate all the major polls. Five or six at a time for the presidential nomination.
Checking yesterday, RCP had Biden leading comfortably with 33-35%, Sanders at 15-17%, Warren doing well at 8-10%, Harris next at 6-8%, Buttigieg at 5-7%, and among the other perhaps credible candidates, O'Rourke struggling at just 4-5%.
Finding this interesting on a number of levels I checked with some friends to see what they might have to say about the state of the race.
Some took note of Warren's numbers. She, they said, is the nomination processes' Energizer Bunny. Campaigning tirelessly and coming up with plans for new social programs almost every day. It appears, friends say, that she is appealing to enough of Bernie's people to both bring him down and propel her forward.
Some were surprised by Harris' and Beto's anemic numbers. Both are among the most successful fund raisers but that isn't appearing to attract voters. As a result they are languishing in single-digit land.
And then there is Mayor Pete who just a few weeks ago was all the rage. When Biden announced, Buttigieg was solidly in third place with support from up to15 percent of potential Democratic voters. He, too, appeared to be able to attract all the money his campaign could responsibly spend.
When I asked why they thought the Mayor had slipped far in the polls, I heard some surprising thoughts.
"Because he's gay," one friend said. A friend who happens to be gay.
"It surprises me that you would say that," I said.
"Let me restate it. It's not because he's gay but because he's running as a gay candidate."
"I'm confused," I said, "Say a little more."
"It's not as if he's running for president and happens to be gay but it's because he is giving the impression that he's running because he is a gay person for what happens to be the presidency of the United States.
"It seems that when he launched his campaign he was wonderfully comfortable to include his husband in campaign events and interviews. Just like Biden and the others feature their spouses at their rallies. That seemed to be working well. He was all over the media and solidly in third place in the polls. But then everything about Mayor Pete, encouraged and often initiated by him, seemed to be about his gayness. And his numbers began to shrink.
"Note how this was very different from Obama's approach. He made an effort to make his blackness incidental. The last thing he wanted the race to be about was race. And, of course, he won."
"I get what you're saying," I said, "I get the distinction."
"Check it out with the other people you're calling." Which I did.
A few noted that his slide in the polls began at about the same time Time magazine featured the mayor and his husband on its cover.
"This," another friend pointed out, "was also when it became clear that much of Buttigieg's money was coming from gay activists. I'm not sure this is working politically. I hate the idea but it could be hurting him in the polls."
"What about Beto?" I asked.
A friend said, "He's too kooky even for the Democrats."
Actually I take a peek more often than that. I confess to every two weeks. All right, sometimes weekly.
Real Clear Politics (RCP) is where I turn as they list and aggregate all the major polls. Five or six at a time for the presidential nomination.
Checking yesterday, RCP had Biden leading comfortably with 33-35%, Sanders at 15-17%, Warren doing well at 8-10%, Harris next at 6-8%, Buttigieg at 5-7%, and among the other perhaps credible candidates, O'Rourke struggling at just 4-5%.
Finding this interesting on a number of levels I checked with some friends to see what they might have to say about the state of the race.
Some took note of Warren's numbers. She, they said, is the nomination processes' Energizer Bunny. Campaigning tirelessly and coming up with plans for new social programs almost every day. It appears, friends say, that she is appealing to enough of Bernie's people to both bring him down and propel her forward.
Some were surprised by Harris' and Beto's anemic numbers. Both are among the most successful fund raisers but that isn't appearing to attract voters. As a result they are languishing in single-digit land.
And then there is Mayor Pete who just a few weeks ago was all the rage. When Biden announced, Buttigieg was solidly in third place with support from up to15 percent of potential Democratic voters. He, too, appeared to be able to attract all the money his campaign could responsibly spend.
When I asked why they thought the Mayor had slipped far in the polls, I heard some surprising thoughts.
"Because he's gay," one friend said. A friend who happens to be gay.
"It surprises me that you would say that," I said.
"Let me restate it. It's not because he's gay but because he's running as a gay candidate."
"I'm confused," I said, "Say a little more."
"It's not as if he's running for president and happens to be gay but it's because he is giving the impression that he's running because he is a gay person for what happens to be the presidency of the United States.
"It seems that when he launched his campaign he was wonderfully comfortable to include his husband in campaign events and interviews. Just like Biden and the others feature their spouses at their rallies. That seemed to be working well. He was all over the media and solidly in third place in the polls. But then everything about Mayor Pete, encouraged and often initiated by him, seemed to be about his gayness. And his numbers began to shrink.
"Note how this was very different from Obama's approach. He made an effort to make his blackness incidental. The last thing he wanted the race to be about was race. And, of course, he won."
"I get what you're saying," I said, "I get the distinction."
"Check it out with the other people you're calling." Which I did.
A few noted that his slide in the polls began at about the same time Time magazine featured the mayor and his husband on its cover.
"This," another friend pointed out, "was also when it became clear that much of Buttigieg's money was coming from gay activists. I'm not sure this is working politically. I hate the idea but it could be hurting him in the polls."
"What about Beto?" I asked.
A friend said, "He's too kooky even for the Democrats."
Labels: 2020 Democratic Candidates, Beto O'Rourke, Elizabeth Warren, Gayness, Joe Biden, Pete Buttigieg, Real Clear Politics, Time Magazine
posted by Steven Zwerling at
4:16 AM
0 Comments
